Young India's big problem is that it has too many old leaders
everywhere. Time to ring out the old. by R Jagannathan Jul 10, 2012
Sometimes,
one wonders if the old Mughal technique of powerful princes imprisoning their
Emperor-Dads and grabbing power is not a better way to ring out the old and
bring in new ideas to governance.
In
modern-day India ,
the thought processes on this score are ancient. The young are not leading, and
the old are not retiring — or even receding gracefully into the background. Whether
it is politics of sport or even business, old is oversold. We respect age too
much, and have been paying a price for it.
The
country’s median age is about 26. Some 30 percent of the population is minor —
below 14. And 95 percent of India ’s
population is below 64, but we are ruled usually by people well above that age… When
the old stay on for too long, they are likely to fail for want of better ideas,
newer approaches to 21st century challenges. India is a
young country, and the first reform we need to is to ask the old to retire
gracefully to make way for new ideas. Age needs respect, not jobs for life at
the cost of the young and fit.
The Ashram Trust was thus
formed to safeguard the numerous Ashram properties which were in the name of
the Mother, who remained a French citizen… Thus the Ashram Trust deed was not
drafted keeping in mind the future of the Ashram. It was primarily meant to
protect the properties of the Ashram in the changed political circumstances of Pondicherry , for the
Ashram properties might have been even confiscated under the Indian law which
had not yet come into force in 1955. The Trust Deed was thus hurriedly
drafted and registered at Vanur, which comes under Tamilnadu… This is the
reason why there are no bye-laws in it, no elaborate framework of rules except
the most basic rules for sadhana, and no contingency plans for the future.
There was no need for them at that point of time, because the Mother was very
active and visited the Playground every day to oversee the physical education
of the children. The Trust Deed was thus written keeping the Mother in the
centre with absolute powers over the disciples and properties of the Ashram,
and it does not anticipate the state of affairs in the Ashram in the case of
the Mother’s withdrawal of her physical presence.
- Our
Ashram Belongs to Sri Aurobindo: who does not ...
- Letter to the Trustees from Sri Aurobindo Centre, ...
- Third Letter from Bengaluru Study Circle to the Ma...
- Call for Collective Meditation
- The Sri Aurobindo Ashram and its Internal Manageme...
- Court Grants Injunction On Not Disturbing Radhikar...
- The Right to Reject Our Rulers – An Angry Ashramit...
- Democracy Sans Politics - by Aspirant
- Letter to the Trustees from the Devotees and Disci...
- Members of Parliament Seek Clarifications from Ash...
- Second Letter from Bangalore Study Circle to the A...
- An Appeal to the Supporters of a Gurudrohi − Hrush...
We
have come here for Sri Aurobindo and
the Mother and it is their work that we do. So how can anyone take away our
work just because we are fighting those...
RYD wrote... Thanks for this lucid and plainspoken post. Such
a note of clarification was overdue but now things can be seen with a better
perspective. The post says:>>It is never too late for the... Continue >>
H Acharya wrote... Over the recent years, plenty of similar
appeals have been made to the managing trustee, from the hands of senior
sadhaks and devotees of all shades from far and near. Yet, all these pleas
have... Continue >>
Media and News Reports
- Sept
23, 2010: Ashram Trust "does not approve" of TLOSA book!
- March
5, 2009: State imposes book ban
- Dec
31, 2008: High court calls to author
- Dec
12, 2008: Petition holds up release of book
- Dec
11, 2008: Book on Sri Aurobindo irks devotess
- Nov
6, 2008: Orissa High Court stays release of book on Sri Aurobindo
No comments:
Post a Comment